Sep. 15th, 2006

a_cubed: caricature (Default)
The newly authorised international pseudo-country-code top-level domain of .eu was approved last year. As with the new gTLDs (.biz, .info, .museum, .aero) the registrars included a "sunrise period" during which only trademark owners can register their mark as a domain (supposedly anyway - some registrars have also been extending this to other issues such as "right of personality" for individual names and similar). One of the first arbitration cases (see Michael Geist on domain name arbitration) was launched recently. This one, I believe, shows the utterly ridiculous nature of the whole trademarks in domain names and sunrise periods issue. There is a company which has a trademark in an EU country (czech at least and maybe others) on the word "sex". So much for trademarks not being allowed on generic words. Another company trademarked sex.eu (and also casino.eu) and launched dispute resolution proceedings when they weren't the trademark owners who were awarded sex.eu.
OutLaw story.

Trademarks were developed to prevent unfair business practices, such as building a shoddy car called a Rolls-Royce and then trading on the goodwill of the original brand to sell inferior goods or to penetrate a market. The justification for trademarks is as much about consumer protection (knowing what you're buying without having to go digging through company records) as it is about rewarding the good business of the existing company. ALlowing trademarking of words such as sex, and then allowing sunrise registration of such trademarks in new domain names, brings the law into serious disrepute. It used to be that you had to have actually been trading under a recognisable name before you could get a trademark, and it used to only be valid within a very specific domain, unless you became a sufficiently well-known mark (such as Rolls-Royce again) such that customers would need protection within all domains.

It's time we stopped regarding trademarks as "intellectual property" and started regarding them as consumer protection.
a_cubed: caricature (Default)
Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] autopope for this one.

You scored as Poland. Your army is Poland\'s army. Your tenacity will form a concept in the history of your nation and you\'re also ready to continue fighting even if your country is occupied by the enemy. Other nations that are included in this category are Greece, Norway, Belgium and the Netherlands.

</td>

Poland

94%

British and the Commonwealth

81%

Italy

69%

Finland

69%

United States

56%

France, Free French and the Resistance

44%

Soviet Union

31%

Germany

31%

Japan

31%

In which World War 2 army you should have fought?
created with QuizFarm.com

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21 222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 11:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios